ePubs
The open archive for STFC research publications
Home
About ePubs
Content Policies
News
Help
Privacy/Cookies
Contact ePubs
Full Record Details
Persistent URL
http://purl.org/net/epubs/work/55933
Record Status
Checked
Record Id
55933
Title
How good are extrapolated bi-projection methods for linear feasibility problems?
Contributors
NIM Gould (STFC Rutherford Appleton Lab.)
Abstract
We consider extrapolated projection methods for solving linear feasibility problems. Both successive and sequential methods of a two-set projection scheme are examined. The best algorithm in the class of algorithms that we considered was an extrapolated sequential method. When this was compared to an interior point method using the CUTEr/Netlib linear programming test problems it was found that the bi-projection method was fastest (or equal fastest) for 31% of the cases, while the interior point code was fastest in 71% of the cases. The interior-point method succeeded on all examples, but the best bi-projection method considered here failed to solve 37% of the problems within reasonable CPU time or iteration thresholds.
Organisation
CSE
,
CSE-NAG
,
STFC
Keywords
Funding Information
Related Research Object(s):
Licence Information:
Language
English (EN)
Type
Details
URI(s)
Local file(s)
Year
Report
RAL Technical Reports
RAL-TR-2011-009. 2011.
RAL-TR-2011-009.pdf
2011
Journal Article
Computational Optimization and Applications 51, no. 3 (2012): 1089-1095.
doi:10.1007/s10589-011-9414-2
2012
Showing record 1 of 1
Recent Additions
Browse Organisations
Browse Journals/Series
Login to add & manage publications and access information for OA publishing
Username:
Password:
Useful Links
Chadwick & RAL Libraries
Jisc Open Policy Finder
Journal Checker Tool
Google Scholar